Identify exploitable weaknesses.
Independent security assessments for web and mobile applications, cloud environments, AI systems, and hosts.
Understand your exposure.
Prioritize what matters.
Defined scope. Validated findings.
Direct communication with your security practitioner.
Assess authentication, authorization, business logic, and input handling. Validate injection and client-side vulnerabilities with reproducible evidence and clear remediation guidance.
Evaluate cloud identities, permissions, configurations, and exposed services. Trace how individual weaknesses could enable unauthorized access or broader compromise.
Assess trust boundaries between users, models, tools, and data. Test for prompt injection, excessive agent permissions, and unintended access through connected services.
Test Android and iOS applications for insecure storage, authentication weaknesses, exposed secrets, and insecure network communication. Evaluate interactions with backend APIs within the agreed scope.
Assess Windows and Linux hosts for exposed services, vulnerable software, insecure configurations, and excessive privileges. Identify escalation paths and prioritize system hardening.
Changing an object identifier returns a resource belonging to another account.
Enforce object-level authorization on every request. Verify ownership server-side.
Receive a structured assessment that explains the issue, its impact, and the recommended next steps. Findings are documented for both technical remediation and informed decision-making.
Direct practitioner involvement.
Clear communication throughout the engagement.
Agree on objectives, assets, access requirements, and testing boundaries. Confirm authorization, deliverables, timelines, and pricing before testing begins.
Combine manual assessment with targeted tooling. Validate findings, document evidence, and communicate significant risks during the engagement.
Review the findings and recommended priorities with your team. Verify implemented fixes within the agreed retesting scope.
Independent security expertise for product development, client delivery, and specialist engagements.
Assess application security before a release or enterprise review. Give engineering teams validated findings and clear remediation priorities.
Scope a product review ↗Integrate independent security assessments into client projects. Align testing, reporting, and communication with your delivery requirements.
Discuss an agency engagement ↗Extend delivery capacity through scoped specialist support. Subcontracting arrangements can include reporting under your brand, with responsibilities agreed in advance.
Discuss specialist support ↗Pricing reflects the agreed scope, environment complexity, assessment depth, and timeline. A written scope and quote are provided before testing begins.
Yes. Engagements can be structured as specialist support or scoped subcontracting under your brand. Confidentiality, communication, and delivery requirements are agreed before work begins.
Start with a brief description of the environment, assessment objectives, and preferred timeline. Testing begins after written authorization, scope, access, and operational boundaries are agreed.
No. This is an independent technical security review. The findings can support your security program, but the engagement does not itself confer a compliance certification.
Share your environment, assessment objectives, and preferred timeline to discuss a suitable scope.
trace@local ↗